A proposed eco-resort in Purnululu National Park, home to the iconic Bungle Bungles, has sparked a fresh round of debate. The West Australian government has given the green light for a global tourism company to build a 16-room luxury lodge in the park. While the development is backed by one traditional owner group, other stakeholders are crying foul, saying the deal benefits only a select few.
For 4X4ers, the question is: what does this mean for access, camping, and the future of one of WA’s most remote and breathtaking destinations?
A More Exclusive Destination?
Purnululu has long been a bucket-list spot for 4X4ers. The 4X4-only track leading into the park is a big part of the adventure, with corrugated roads, river crossings, and rugged terrain keeping it off-limits to the average highway caravaner. But with a high-end lodge catering to well-heeled tourists, will the park shift towards a more polished, commercialised experience?
There’s precedent for this. Other remote parks with luxury lodges, like El Questro and the Kimberley Coastal Camp, have seen a shift in focus from DIY adventurers to fly-in clientele. Over time, that often leads to more restrictions on free camping, increased park fees, and a push for more infrastructure that doesn’t necessarily cater to 4X4ers looking for a remote, self-sufficient experience.
Will It Change How You Can Access the Park?
One of the big concerns for 4X4ers is whether this development will impact access to Purnululu. Right now, the only way in is via a 4X4 track off the Great Northern Highway, a route that’ll make mince meat of any luxo SUV on low profile tyres.
As a result, luxury lodges often bring with them a push for all-weather roads, potentially leading to upgrades that could make the park more accessible to high-clearance 2WD vehicles. While that might sound like a good thing for some, it often goes hand-in-hand with increased traffic, more regulations, and even access restrictions for those who prefer to explore on their own terms.
Will Camping Be Affected?
Currently, Purnululu has a couple of designated campgrounds, Kurrajong and Walardi, both fairly basic and catering to self-sufficient campers. While the eco-resort will be confined to a special lease, developments like this often come with an increase in park fees or changes to how camping is managed.
Will self-sufficient campers get pushed further from the key sites while premium experiences take centre stage? Will more restrictions follow in the name of ‘preserving’ the environment, while luxury guests enjoy sunset cocktails overlooking the same domes? It’s a scenario that’s played out before in other remote locations.
What’s Next?
For now, the lodge is still in the early planning stages, and the WA government says community concerns will be considered. But for 4X4ers, this raises broader questions about the future of access to Australia’s most remote national parks.
Are we seeing a shift where these places, once the domain of rugged explorers, are slowly being turned into playgrounds for cashed-up tourists who want the experience without the challenge?
And if that’s the case, how long before park management decides that self-sufficient adventurers are more trouble than they’re worth?
For now, Purnululu remains a 4X4-only adventure. But if this development goes ahead, it could mark the start of a very different era for one of WA’s most iconic off-road destinations.
3 comments
I am an immigrant from England, or so they tell me, as I was only 4-year-old at the time. My family had a choice of Australia, South Africa, or Canada, but chose Australia. My whole family became Australian citizens along with the lady that I married and hence my children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren have been born here and have the right to call themselves Australian. I would like all my family to be able to study and observe, with sensitivity, all parks, bush, gorges, rivers and coastal waters that are not actually lived or relied upon, without paying for it. Leave our parks alone, and I don’t mind sharing.
It never ceases to amaze me how a world heritage area can be compromised by the powers to be and a select few by allowing these types of ventures. Leave it alone and let it stay in its rugged form. Smells of favouritism and possibly corruption if you ask me!
Aren’t there already a couple of other lodges within the park catering mostly to private groups and higher end travelers?