News

More Ways for Insurers to Watch You

Land Rover 110 shadow

There’s a new thing in car insurance and you could will soon be part of it: Usage-Based Insurance (UBI), sometimes called Black Box Insurance.
Sounds vanilla enough, you pay for insurance for the amount you use the car. For those of us with a daily driver as well as the 4WD, it has the potential to drop premiums right down.

Check out the data collected:

  • Speed – Exceeding the speed limit will show a high risk red flag
  • Car Mileage – an obvious one-the less you drive the safer for the car
  • Braking – Sudden and heavy braking applications are signs of poor driving habits
  • Cornering – taking corners in a controlled manner is best
  • Steering – smooth is less risky than jerky steering
  • Fatigue – length of trip without breaks
  • Time of driving – night time is considered riskier than daytime driving

Formerly, data used was broad stereotypical basics such as age, gender, what kind of car your drive and where you live-and for many that data costs us due to other, less sensible (or just unlucky?) drivers sharing the same categories.

UBI can take you out of a stiff category and give you a better (or worse) rating.

What does this have to do with 4WDers? Sure, with older 4X4s the speeds are usually slow, acceleration glacial, steering vague and brakes effective only if you’re strong enough but the sudden lurching side to side, front to back and all the body roll when crossing eroded sections of track or rock crawling are bound to confuse the gyroscopic data algorithms somewhat. Recent 4X4s are some of the quickest to drive on the road due not just to vehicle performance but due to forward visibility and confidence inspiring safety.
Most don’t yet collect location data, but it’s only a matter of time. How many of us have it in writing that our insurance covers us off-road, including specifically non-gazetted roads? Most only cover gazetted roads.
…and how often do tracks deviate from the gazetted road? Here’s an instance where the road wasn’t where it should have been which could cost you an insurance pay-out.
Or is this fear unfounded?

 

What’s the tech involved?

Flight Recorder, good for insurance companies. Photo from atsb.gov.au/publications/2014/black-box-flight-recorders/
Not nearly as orange or bulky as a flight recorder. Photo from atsb.gov.au/publications/2014/black-box-flight-recorders/

There’s a few types of UBI ‘in the works’. The cheapest for insurance companies to implement, and AAMI’s Safe Driver App is an example, uses a mobile phone app to record and report data. Mitsubishi also have such a system in Japan with rewards of cheaper servicing and free coffee if you allow your data to be collected-and Mitsubishi shares this data directly with insurance companies. How’s that for customer privacy.

Mobile phone app-based data collection would be great for bus commuters. Turn it on for a few bus trips and switch it off when recklessly driving your own car.

The next data collection method is using a car’s OBD-II (On-Board Diagnostics) port, either with Bluetooth to the driver’s phone app, or with its own 3G or 4G data transmission. This has been trialled by QBE Insurance-their ‘Insurance Box’ scheme.

The final method, and that already used by many car hire companies and car/truck fleets, is a hardwired stand-alone ‘Black Box’ style unit with GPS for location and 3G/4G connectivity to send information back to base.

Other Uses

In the UK, there is a very bad problem with vehicle theft of Land Rovers, and many owners fit their own GPS based vehicle tracker with 3G/4G connectivity. This can be used to trace stolen vehicles…or to let family members or mates track your trip and help co-ordinate rescue trips when your CV joint goes bang, you’re in a boghole and your winch fails, all at once. You can buy them in Australia too, retailing for a few hundred dollars.

Credit: user oogiboig via Wikimedia commons
Under scrutiny from every angle. Credit: user oogiboig via Wikimedia commons

One Nation Under CCTV?

As graffiti artist Banksy implied, we’re being watched whether we like it or not. Before long the move will be for the car manufacturing industry to have data collectors built in to the vehicle, so we’re unlikely to escape it, unless you think wearing a tin-foil hat will help. With the range of peripheral sensors on cars now, the potential for data about bad habits such as tailgating, driving close to cyclists or parked cars, or wandering all over the lane to be collected is massive.

There is harsh privacy laws regarding tracking devices, so read-up before fitting them to your work ute!

Time to break those bad driving habits or prepare to pay up!

Would you install a vehicle tracker for cheaper insurance? Tell us in the comments below.

8 Comments

Click here to post a comment

  • when that happens I will just not have insurance. never had a claim in 50 years ; so just a waste of money anyway.

  • As sure as UBI hardware will eventually be fitted to all vehicles at point of manufacture, no doubt there will be ” enterprising folk ” who will be more than tech savvy enough to figure out methods ( programming & algorithms, etc ) to circumvent the included software, regardless of incorporated safe-guards, so false data will be sent to the data collection point; thus reducing their individual insurance premium to what they consider an ( acceptable ) amount they are willing to pay. On the other hand ( read positive aspects ) should such data collection significantly & deliberately ” reward the vehicle purchaser ” with free coffee . . . whoopee doo . . . every 5th comprehensive vehicle service free of charge, a significant discount on your next vehicle purchase, and long-term good driving habits behaviour rewarded commensurately; then UBI longer-term won’t be seen so much of as a gross invasion of privacy.

  • I thought poor risk sorted themselves out without others needing a chaperone.
    Take note, I feel similar to the sentiment “dennis” expressed.

  • If all this electronic crap is suppose to make us safer, it’s failing miserably, road statistics back me on that. As for big brother, I’m afraid avoiding someone looking over your shoulder is impossible these days. That said, I drive a 40 year old LJ Torana that I took up through Innamincka and down the Birdsville track, I visited Bourke and Wills grave on the trip as well. I did it the last time the Cooper flooded. No ABS, no traction control, no stability control, no problems, no punctures and no getting bogged. I had a blast and I wouldn’t change my car for a current 4×4 electronic nightmare under any circumstances.

  • And who determines what’s appropriate driving behaviour. Who watches the insurers to make sure ‘acceptable’ driving behaviour doesn’t suddenly turn into unacceptable driving behaviour to avoid paying a claim.
    You can bet the insurers are not putting these systems in expecting to make lesser profits.

  • I remember saying about 15 years ago (and everyone laughed at me) that eventually your car will tell you when it is due for service. Ignore it and it will shut down. When you take it in, your built in GPS will be analysed by the Pleece Farce which will see where you have exceeded the speed limit and you will be made to pay the fines before getting your car back. Looks like that day is just around the corner. I will never own a car with a built in GPS. If people won’t buy cars with this crap on them, we might have a chance but there are always those who say you have nothing to fear if you do nothing wrong.

  • You can imagine at claim time, your insurance company pouring through every bump in the road to find a reason not to pay out. They do that now to a degree so it will just be a new tool to maximise profit. Any discount would disappear over a few years and then it would be back to the old Premium and watching your every move. No thanks

Newsletter

Follow Us

Download Our Apps